본문내용 바로가기
MD의선택 무료배송 이벤트 사은품 소득공제

형법 3년간 판례정리(2020) 2017년 7월~2020년 6월 판례공보 및 미간행 판례

신호진 지음 | 문형사 | 2020년 06월 24일 출간
클로버 리뷰쓰기
  • 정가 : 15,000원
    판매가 : 13,500 [10%↓ 1,500원 할인]
  • 통합포인트 :
    [기본적립] 150원 적립 [1% 적립] [추가적립] 5만원 이상 구매 시 2천원 추가적립 안내 [회원혜택] 실버등급 이상, 3만원 이상 구매 시 2~4% 추가적립 안내
  • 추가혜택 : 포인트 안내 도서소득공제 안내 추가혜택 더보기
  • 배송비 : 무료 배송비 안내
  • 배송일정 : 서울특별시 종로구 세종대로 기준 지역변경
    08월 06일 출고 예정 배송일정 안내

이 책의 이벤트 해외주문/바로드림/제휴사주문/업체배송건의 경우 1+1 증정상품이 발송되지 않습니다.

  • 캘린더 수록 80p 코넬식 노트, 취준생 필수 사은품 선택가능
    2020.07.21 ~ 2020.08.31
  • LEET/변호사시험/PSAT/5급행시 교재 베스트셀러 빠르게 찾..
    2018.05.24 ~ 2020.12.31
상품상세정보
ISBN 9791189917722(1189917726)
쪽수 233쪽
크기 규격外 판형알림

책소개

이 책이 속한 분야

- 독자대상 : 변호사 시험 준비생
- 구성 : 이론
- 특징 :
① 정확한 사실관계의 정리·소개
② 주요쟁점의 명확한 부각
③ 필요한 판결이유의 발췌 소개
④ 꼭 읽고 기억해야 할 중요부분 강조

저자소개

목차

…… 형 법 총 론 ……
[1] 죄형법정주의 ·································································································· 3
위임입법의 한계(大判 2018도7989) ········································································ 3
소급효금지의 원칙(大判 2015도17936) ··································································· 7
명확성의 원칙(大決 2018초기306) ········································································· 9
유추해석금지의 원칙(大判 2015도8335, 전원합의체 판결) ······································· 11
[2] 형법의 시간적 적용범위 ·················································································· 22
「형법」 제1조 제2항과 경과규정의 관계(大判 2016도16757) ··································· 22
「형법」 제1조 제2항과 동기설(大判 2015도2390) ··················································· 23
[3] 형법의 장소적 적용범위 ·················································································· 24
외국에서의 미결구금에 대한 형법 제7조의 유추적용 여부(大判 2017도5977, 전원합의체 판결) ······· 24
[4] 범죄의 의의와 종류 ························································································ 27
즉시범과 계속범의 구별실익(大判 2017도7937) ····················································· 27
[5] 행위의 주체와 객체 ························································································ 28
법인 설립 이전의 행위에 대한 양벌규정의 적용 여부(大判 2015도10388) ················· 28
대표자의 위법행위에 대한 법인 처벌의 근거(大判 2013도6962) ······························· 29
양벌규정에 의한 벌칙규정의 수범자 영역의 확대(大判 2017도13982) ······················· 30
[6] 정당행위 ······································································································· 32
사용자의 직장폐쇄의 정당성(大判 2013도7896) ····················································· 32
민법상 자력구제의 요건(大判 2017도9999) ··························································· 33
‘사회상규에 위배되지 아니하는 행위’의 요건(大判 2017도2758) ······························ 34
[7] 책임능력 ······································································································· 35
형법 제10조의 심신장애의 판단방법 등(大判 2018도7658) ······································ 35
[8] 기대가능성 ···································································································· 37
병역법 제88조 제1항의 ‘정당한 사유’의 의미(大判 2016도10912, 전원합의체 판결) ··· 37
[9] 불능미수 ······································································································· 41
불능미수의 성립요건(大判 2019도97) ··································································· 41
준강간죄의 불능미수(大判 2018도16002, 전원합의체 판결) ····································· 42
[10] 정범·공범의 일반이론 ··················································································· 46
대향범과 형법총칙상의 공범규정의 적용 여부(大判 2017도4240) ····························· 46
[11] 간접정범 ····································································································· 48
피해자의 행위를 이용한 경우(大判 2016도17733) ·················································· 48
[12] 공동정범 ····································································································· 49
공모공동정범의 성립요건(大判 2017도14322, 전원합의체 판결) ······························· 49
[13] 종 범 ········································································································· 51
종범의 성립요건(大判 2016도12865) ···································································· 51
[14] 공범과 신분 ································································································ 52
비신분자가 가중적 신분자의 범행에 가담한 경우(大判 2018도10047) ······················· 52
[15] 수 죄 ········································································································· 53
포괄일죄와 실체적 경합범의 구별기준(大判 2018도10779) ······································ 53
재심대상사건과 재심판결 확정 전에 범한 범죄의 관계(大判 2018도20698, 전원합의체 판결) ·· 54
「형법」 제39조 제1항이 적용되는 경우(大判 2018도14863) ····································· 56
사후적 경합범에서 형 감경의 방법(大判 2017도14609, 전원합의체 판결) ················· 57
[16] 형벌의 종류 ································································································ 60
몰수와 추징(大判 2017도8611) ············································································ 60
[17] 누 범 ········································································································· 61
누범전과와 형 선고의 유효성(大判 2017도4019) ··································································· 61
「특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률」상의 누범전과의 계산방법(大判 2019도17381) ······················ 62
「특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률」 제5조의4 제5항의 누범전과의 의미(大判 2019도18891) ········ 64
[18] 집행유예·선고유예·가석방 ·············································································· 66
집행유예 결격사유(大判 2018도17589) ································································· 66
사후적 경합범에 대한 선고유예 여부(大判 2018오1) ·············································· 67
선고유예 실효 결정의 시기(大決 2017모3459) ······················································· 68

…… 형 법 각 론 ……
[1] 상해와 폭행의 죄 ··························································································· 69
특수상해죄에서의 ‘위험한 물건’/ 형법 제1조 제2항의 적용 여부(大判 2015도5854) ··· 69
상습폭행죄의 죄수와 소추조건(大判 2017도10956) ················································ 71
[2] 과실치사상의 죄 ···························································································· 72
업무상과실치사상죄에서의 ‘업무’의 의미(大判 2016도16738) ·································· 72
업무상과실치상죄와 「교통사고처리 특례법」의 관계(大判 2016도21034) ···················· 73
[3] 강요의 죄 ····································································································· 74
강요죄의 수단으로서의 협박의 의미(大判 2015도16696) ······················································· 74
[4] 체포와 감금의 죄 ··························································································· 76
체포죄의 실행의 착수시기와 기수시기(大判 2016도18713) ······································ 76
부작위에 의한 감금(大判 2017도7134) ································································· 77
[5] 약취·유인 및 인신매매의 죄 ············································································ 78
보호·감독자의 미성년자약취죄의 주체성 여부(大判 2015도10032) ···························· 78
[6] 강간과 추행의 죄 ··························································································· 79
강간의 수단인 폭행의 정도와 그 판단기준 등(大判 2017도21249) ··························· 79
강간죄에서 폭행·협박과 간음행위의 선후관계(大判 2016도16948) ···························· 81
강제추행죄에서의 폭행과 추행의 정도(大判 2019도15994) ······································ 82
준강간죄의 실행의 착수시기(大判 2018도19295) ··················································· 84
강간치상죄나 강제추행치상죄에 있어서의 ‘상해’의 의미(大判 2017도3196) ··············· 85
위력에 의한 심신미약자 추행죄의 성립 여부(大判 2019도3341) ······························· 86
[7] 명예에 관한 죄 ······························································································ 93
공직자에 대한 명예훼손 등(大判 2016도14678) ····················································· 93
‘사실의 적시’와 ‘의견 표현’의 구별기준(大判 2017도15628) ···································· 95
명예훼손죄의 고의(大判 2016도15819) ································································· 97
질문과 명예훼손죄의 고의(大判 2018도4200) ························································ 98
형법 제310조와 공공의 이익(大判 2016도8557) ···················································· 99
‘사람을 비방할 목적’과 ‘공공의 이익을 위한 것’의 관계(大判 2018도15868) ··········· 100
무례한 표현과 모욕의 관계(大判 2017도2661) ····················································· 102
[8] 신용·업무와 경매에 관한 죄 ·········································································· 103
업무방해죄에서 ‘업무’의 의미(大判 2014도3270) ·················································· 103
업무방해죄에서 ‘위계’의 의미(大判 2016도18858) ················································ 104
업무방해죄에서 ‘위력’의 의미(大判 2017도12541) ················································ 105
부작위에 의한 위력의 인정요건(大判 2017도13211) ············································· 106
위계·위력에 의한 업무방해죄의 성립요건 등(大判 2017도19499) ···························· 107
[9] 주거침입의 죄 ····························································································· 111
주거침입죄의 객체와 위요지(大判 2019도16484) ·················································· 111
위요지의 요건(大判 2017도690) ········································································· 112
상습절도죄와 주거침입죄의 관계(大判 2017도4044) ············································· 113
[10] 재산죄의 기본개념 ····················································································· 114
친족상도례의 적용효과(大判 2016도6757) ··························································· 114
[11] 사기의 죄 ·································································································· 115
기망행위에 의하여 국가적·공공적 법익을 침해한 경우(大判 2019도2003) ················ 115
규정을 위반한 공사도급계약체결과 사기죄(大判 2015도10570) ······························ 116
처분행위의 기능과 요건(大判 2018도7030) ························································· 118
사기죄의 피해자(大判 2017도19799) ·································································· 119
종교행위와 사기죄의 관계(大判 2016도12460) ····················································· 120
보험계약 체결시의 고지의무 위반(大判 2014도2754) ············································ 121
요양급여비용·보험금 청구와 기망행위(大判 2017도17699) ····································· 122
요양급여비용에 대한 사기죄의 성립 여부(大判 2019도1839) ································ 124
기망행위의 상대방(大判 2017도8449) ································································· 125
기망행위와 처분행위 사이의 인과관계(大判 2015도12932) ···································· 126
소송사기죄의 성립요건(大判 2018도13305) ························································· 127
사기죄의 편취액 산정방법(大判 2017도12649) ····················································· 128
사기죄의 편취액 산정방법(大判 2018도19772) ····················································· 129
채무불이행과 사기죄(大判 2017도20682) ···························································· 130
[12] 공갈의 죄 ·································································································· 132
권리행사와 공갈죄(大判 2018도19493)································································· 132
[13] 횡령의 죄 ·································································································· 133
횡령죄의 주체와 위탁관계(大判 2017도17494, 전원합의체 판결) ···························· 133
사기죄의 죄수 및 횡령죄에서의 위탁관계(大判 2017도3894) ································· 137
불법원인급여와 횡령죄(大判 2017도9254) ··························································· 138
불법원인급여와 횡령죄(大判 2017도11931) ························································· 139
횡령죄의 객체(大判 2019도9773) ······································································· 140
목적·용도를 한정하여 위탁된 금전의 소유관계(大判 2015도18253) ························ 141
법인·단체의 자금으로 대표자의 소송비용을 지급한 경우(大判 2016도5816) ············· 143
비자금의 조성·사용과 불법영득의사(大判 2016도9027) ········································· 144
용도가 엄격하게 제한된 자금을 전용한 경우(大判 2016도16388) ··························· 146
[14] 배임의 죄 ·································································································· 147
채무자의 동산 양도담보 목적물 보관의무(大判 2019도9756, 전원합의체 판결) ········ 147
배임죄에서 ‘타인의 사무를 처리하는 자’의 의미(大判 2014도9907) ························ 150
영업비밀 누설행위(大判 2017도3808) ································································· 152
배임죄에서 재산상 손해의 의미 및 판단기준(大判 2017도6151) ····························· 153
대표권 남용에 의한 약속어음 발행의 경우 배임죄의 기수·미수 판단기준(大判 2014도1104, 전원합의체 판결) ·························································································································· 155
대표권 남용의 경우 배임죄의 기수·미수의 판단기준(大判 2014도9960) ··················· 158
경영판단과 배임죄의 고의(大判 2015도12633) ····················································· 160
부동산 이중매매의 형사책임(大判 2017도4027, 전원합의체 판결) ·························· 162
서면으로 증여한 부동산을 제3자에게 처분한 경우(大判 2016도19308) ··················· 165
부동산 교환계약과 이중매매의 법리(大判 2016도11337) ······································· 166
채무자의 저당권설정의무 및 부동산 양도담보설정의무의 성격(大判 2019도14339, 전원합의체 판결) ·· 167
배임수재죄의 기수시기(大判 2017도11564) ························································· 169
[15] 손괴의 죄 ·································································································· 170
재물손괴죄에서 ‘효용을 해하는 것’의 의미(大判 2017도20455) ······························ 170
재물손괴죄에서 ‘효용을 해하는 것’의 의미(大判 2017도18807) ······························ 172
[16] 권리행사를 방해하는 죄 ·············································································· 173
권리행사방해죄의 객체(大判 2017도4578) ··························································· 173
강제집행면탈죄의 객체(大判 2017도6229) ··························································· 174
강제집행면탈죄의 기수시기(大判 2016도847) ······················································· 175
[17] 공안을 해하는 죄 ······················································································· 176
범죄단체활동죄와 사기죄의 관계(大判 2017도8600) ············································· 176
[18] 교통방해의 죄 ··························································································· 178
집회·시위와 일반교통방해죄의 관계(大判 2017도1056) ········································· 178
[19] 유가증권에 관한 죄 ···················································································· 180
구 「부정수표 단속법」 제5조의 수표 위조·변조의 의미(大判 2019도12022) ·············· 180
[20] 문서에 관한 죄 ·························································································· 181
사문서변조죄의 객체(大判 2014도14924) ···························································· 181
작성권한자가 문서의 내용 일부를 삭제한 경우(大判 2016도20954) ························ 182
공문서 변조의 의미(大判 2016도5218) ······························································· 183
자격모용에 의한 사문서작성죄에서 자격모용의 정도(大判 2017도14560) ················ 184
공전자기록위작·변작죄의 객체와 유추해석금지의 원칙(大判 2016도19170) ·············· 185
허위진단서작성죄에서 허위의 대상(大判 2014도15129) ········································· 187
공전자기록 등 불실기재죄에서 ‘불실의 사실’의 의미(大判 2019도7729) ·················· 189
‘불실기재’인가의 판단기준(大判 2017도21783) ···················································· 191
공문서부정행사죄의 객체(大判 2018도2560) ························································ 192
[21] 성풍속에 관한 죄 ······················································································· 193
공연음란죄에서 음란성의 판단기준(大判 2019도14056) ········································· 193
[22] 공무원의 직무에 관한 죄 ············································································ 195
공무상비밀누설죄의 객체(大判 2014도11441) ······················································ 195
직권남용죄와 강요죄의 성립요건(大判 2018도2236, 전원합의체 판결) ···················· 197
직권남용죄와 강요죄의 성립요건(大判 2019도5186) ············································· 202
실무자의 행위가 ‘의무 없는 일’에 해당하는지의 판단기준(大判 2019도11698) ········· 205
뇌물수수죄와 알선수수죄의 성립요건(大判 2017도12346) ······································ 207
뇌물수수죄와 제3자뇌물수수죄 및 강요죄의 성립 여부(大判 2018도13792,2018도2738, 전원합의체 판결) ························································································································· 209
공무원이 횡령한 자금을 공범자끼리 수수한 경우(大判 2019도11766) ····················· 214
[23] 공무방해에 관한 죄 ···················································································· 215
공무원의 직무집행의 적법성(大判 2016도19417) ·················································· 215
현행범인 체포의 적법요건(大判 2017도21537) ····················································· 217
형집행장 집행의 적법요건(大判 2017도9458) ······················································ 218
체포시 미란다 원칙의 고지시기(大判 2017도10866) ············································· 219
위계에 의한 공무집행방해죄와 직권남용죄(大判 2018도18646) ······························ 220
공무상표시무효죄의 성립요건(大判 2015도5403) ·················································· 222
[24] 도주와 범인은닉의 죄 ················································································· 223
범인도피죄의 주체(大判 2015도20396) ······························································· 223
[25] 위증과 증거인멸의 죄 ················································································· 224
증거은닉죄의 객체(大判 2015도1000) ································································· 224
[26] 무고의 죄 ·································································································· 225
무고죄에서 허위신고인가의 판단시점(大判 2015도15398) ······································ 225
고소사건이 불기소처분을 받은 경우 무고죄의 성립 여부(大判 2018도2614) ············ 226
친고죄에서 고소기간이 경과한 허위사실을 신고한 경우(大判 2018도1818) ·············· 228
무고죄에서 자백의 절차와 시기(大判 2018도7293) ··············································· 229

참고판례 ··········································································································· 230
판례색인 ··········································································································· 235

책 속으로

〈 서 문 〉
“형법 3년간 판례정리”에 대하여

본 “형법 3년간 판례정리”는 ‘2017년 하반기부터 2020년 상반기까지’의 법원공보에 수록된 판례와 미간행 판례를 정리한 자료이다. 본서의 특징을 설명하면 다음과 같다.

1. 정확한 ‘사실관계’의 정리ㆍ소개
판례는 과거에 발생한 범죄에 대한 대법원의 최종적인 판단이다. 그러므로 그 범죄의 사실관계를 모르고서 판례를 공부한다는 것은 ‘어떤 영화를 보지도 않고 또한 그 줄거리도 모르면서 그 영화에 대해서 논하는 것’과 같이 실로 무의미한 일이다. 그래서 본서에서는 대법원... 더보기

Klover 리뷰 (0)

북로그 리뷰 (0) 쓰러가기

도서 구매 후 리뷰를 작성하시면
결제 90일 이내 300원, 발송 후 5일 이내 400원, 이 상품의 첫 리뷰 500원의 포인트를 드립니다.

포인트는 작성 후 다음 날 적립되며, 도서 발송 전 작성 시에는 발송 후 익일에 적립됩니다.
북로그 리뷰는 본인인증을 거친 회원만 작성 가능합니다.
(※ 외서/eBook/음반/DVD/GIFT 및 잡지 상품 제외) 안내
  • 해당도서의 리뷰가 없습니다.

문장수집 (0) 문장수집 쓰기 나의 독서기록 보기
※구매도서의 문장수집을 기록하면 통합포인트 적립 안내

교환/반품/품절안내

※ 상품 설명에 반품/교환 관련한 안내가 있는 경우 그 내용을 우선으로 합니다. (업체 사정에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다.)

교환/반품/품절안내
반품/교환방법 마이룸 > 주문관리 > 주문/배송내역 > 주문조회 > 반품/교환신청 ,
[1:1상담>반품/교환/환불] 또는 고객센터 (1544-1900)

※ 오픈마켓, 해외배송주문, 기프트 주문시 [1:1상담>반품/교환/환불]
    또는 고객센터 (1544-1900)
반품/교환가능 기간 변심반품의 경우 수령 후 7일 이내,
상품의 결함 및 계약내용과 다를 경우 문제점 발견 후 30일 이내
반품/교환비용 변심 혹은 구매착오로 인한 반품/교환은 반송료 고객 부담
반품/교환 불가 사유
  • 소비자의 책임 있는 사유로 상품 등이 손실 또는 훼손된 경우
    (단지 확인을 위한 포장 훼손은 제외)
  • 소비자의 사용, 포장 개봉에 의해 상품 등의 가치가 현저히 감소한 경우
    예) 화장품, 식품, 가전제품(악세서리 포함) 등
  • 복제가 가능한 상품 등의 포장을 훼손한 경우
    예) 음반/DVD/비디오, 소프트웨어, 만화책, 잡지, 영상 화보집
  • 소비자의 요청에 따라 개별적으로 주문 제작되는 상품의 경우 ((1)해외주문도서)
  • 디지털 컨텐츠인 eBook, 오디오북 등을 1회 이상 다운로드를 받았을 경우
  • 시간의 경과에 의해 재판매가 곤란한 정도로 가치가 현저히 감소한 경우
  • 전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한 법률이 정하는 소비자 청약철회 제한 내용에
    해당되는 경우
(1) 해외주문도서 : 이용자의 요청에 의한 개인주문상품으로 단순변심 및 착오로 인한 취소/교환/반품 시 ‘해외주문 반품/취소 수수료’ 고객 부담 (해외주문 반품/취소 수수료 : ①양서-판매정가의 12%, ②일서-판매정가의 7%를 적용)
상품 품절 공급사(출판사) 재고 사정에 의해 품절/지연될 수 있으며, 품절 시 관련 사항에 대해서는
이메일과 문자로 안내드리겠습니다.
소비자 피해보상
환불지연에 따른 배상
  • 상품의 불량에 의한 교환, A/S, 환불, 품질보증 및 피해보상 등에 관한 사항은
    소비자분쟁해결 기준 (공정거래위원회 고시)에 준하여 처리됨
  • 대금 환불 및 환불지연에 따른 배상금 지급 조건, 절차 등은 전자상거래 등에서의
    소비자 보호에 관한 법률에 따라 처리함

바로가기

  • 우측 확장형 배너 2
  • 우측 확장형 배너 2

최근 본 상품